What does it feel like to be published for the first time?


Yesterday, I found out that the paper that I am a co-author on has been accepted for publication. This is my reflection on what it is like to be published in the world of academia.

Sent to production‘. Those were the words that signified the paper we had submitted had was accepted. As someone who has not experienced this before, I was very underwhelmed by the phrasing.

‘Your contribution to science, and therefore, humanity has been moved to the production line where, in an increasingly automated and mass-produced world, it will be packaged in a format that will extract maximum value from the consumer’.

Is there anything we humans can’t turn into a commodity?

I am still one of those naive, ‘young’, ‘scientists’ who is bewildered by the world of scientific publishing. Why are we putting a pay-wall between the results, that took considerable financial resources to obtain, and the consumer, who may get value from it?

I sense that in the near future everything will be open and available for all, not only because it is the right thing to do and the technology exists for it to be possible, but because open access articles get three times more views.

Does it feel good to be published?

In this case, it feels relatively neutral. Here is why.

Firstly, the paper was rejected from the first journal to which it was submitted. From following academics on Twitter over the past few years, this did not surprise me. It was reviewed by a couple of ‘peers’ at a particular journal. We, the symbolic ‘we’, changed a couple of things and submitted it to a different journal and were again judged by some ‘peers’ and it was accepted.

So, it does feel somewhat random as to whether or not you get published. I have developed an attitude that likens peer review and publishing process to that of the weather.

Being annoyed that your paper has not been accepted is a bit like being annoyed at the weather for raining on you and feeling as if the weather had decided to single you out. I am rather even-handed about the whole thing – if it gets published, fine, if not, also fine.

Secondly, I did not write the paper. Although I did an equal share of the work, I did none of the writing, and as a consequence, I do not feel that connected to it. Furthermore, the work was completed in 2018 and subsequently has not occupied my mind for quite a while. It is ‘nice’ to see that the work has reached its logical conclusion, but at the time of doing the work, I did not care about publishing I just liked the idea of doing something I had never done before. So now that is has been ‘approved for production,’ the feeling is relatively neutral.

Thirdly, the work was not directly related to my PhD; it was more of a side project. Because of this, I am not sure that it will go in my thesis and therefore may not help me in obtaining a PhD. Although, I will try my hardest to shoe-horn it in and use it. As, technically, I am a published author, and that shows that I have done something of merit. I would be ecstatic if this paper meant that the PhD is ‘in the bag’, but that is not the same as being happy about being published.

I cannot yet link the paper as it has only just entered production, but when it rolls off the production line and enters the showroom, I will be sure to attach it here.

I have since learnt that ‘production’ is where it gets edited and formatted in the particular style of the journal, which makes sense I suppose.

I wonder if writers of fiction get the same notifications from publishers.

‘Thanks, Mrs Rowling your submission ‘Harry Potter and the ….’ has been moved to production and the product will be within all major retail outlets by the next holiday period’.

Before writing this, I thought it would be relatively rare to publish a paper, but according to this article , there is more than 20 million of us in history. Also, with literally millions of papers being published each year, and many more left in draws and filing cabinets, it is not that interesting.

So, how does it feel to be a published author?

For me, it feels okay.


Published by Louis

Spend less than you earn, Invest the surplus, avoid debt. Eat food, not too much, mostly plants

18 thoughts on “What does it feel like to be published for the first time?

  1. I love your style of writing. We get a window into academia with an honesty at the level of zero-to-very- few f’s given at the pandering level, which means many more f’s can be given from the free consumer level. Congrats on the okay feeling regarding being externally published! Perhaps that’s the feeling the rest of us aspiring authors should strive for. :))

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Congratulations, and I hope better things will follow.

    The publishing journey is long and arduous. I nearly got taken on my a leading agent and an influential editor, both both decided to turn me down, and I eventually self-published a couple of novels, an autobiography, lots of poems, classical piano recordings featuring myself as soloist, and WordPress blog posts.

    I have mixed feelings about it all. Relief that the Internet has opened up countless opportunities to self-publish at a fingertip, along with regret that my work hasn’t been taken on by mainstream.


    Liked by 3 people

  3. Congratulations. The first of many, of course, glad it feels good.

    Can see from Lawrenceez ‘s comment how common my own experience has been, interest from publishers and an agent, and then, the decision to self publish. The Spy ( a real person, not a literary device) would remind us that ‘ Publishing has changed’ and didn’t regard online publishing as in any way second best.


  4. Hey, congrats on this success! It’s just one step towards another paper (one that you’ll be proud of and one you did by yourself) being published! From what I’ve seen on your blog, i know it’ll be happen – and soon too, i hope.


  5. This was super interesting. I am on the fiction:creative side of things, so thank you for sharing. The wording is strange but maybe that’s not unusual? For literary magazines it’s can range anywhere from a simple, automated response, to an eccentric acceptance.
    One time I opted for feedback with a submission, and instead of feedback, I got horribly criticized (I won’t even say critique; it wasn’t constructive), but mostly I’ve had neutral/positive experiences with submission acceptances/rejections.


  6. Clearly we all want to say congrats! It is inspiring for me as I’m just starting my journey into this level of academia writing, and it’s good to gain an insight to what I might experience. The researcher and data minds contribute just as much as a writer. Writers are simply people that know how to extract thoughts and decisions and combine them with the formula of words. This is no different than a mathematician who knows which statistical evidence to use and differentiate using the correct series of formulas and equations. Thus, your contributions are beyond worthy and you should feel proud!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: